ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY

Military leaders are taking on a “holistic review” of troops’ footprint around the world as the U.S. remains focused on “great-power competition,” according to the Pentagon’s top general.

“There’s a very strong argument to be made that we may have forces in places that they shouldn’t be, and we may have forces that are needed in places that they’re not right now,” Army Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Dec. 2 while speaking with the Brookings Institution. 

The Heritage Foundation’s “2021 Index of U.S. Military Strength” gives the U.S. Army high marks for improved readiness but once again scores the service as “marginal” because those readiness gains continue to be offset by ongoing struggles to modernize and grow the force.

The Army isn’t alone. The report also rates the Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps and U.S. nuclear capabilities as marginal. The new U.S. Space Force was not assessed in the 2021 report.

The Heritage Foundation’s “2020 Index of U.S. Military Strength” once again scores the U.S. Army as “marginal” because dramatic improvements in brigade combat team readiness are offset by continuing struggles to modernize the force and grow troop levels. 

The Army isn’t alone. The report also rates the Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps and U.S. nuclear capabilities as marginal. The new U.S. Space Force is not ranked in the 2020 report. 

From a global pandemic to no-notice deployments to the Middle East, the Army continues to prepare for any crisis or mission, the service’s top operations officer said.

“We must be ready for any planned and unplanned crisis,” Lt. Gen. Charles Flynn, deputy Army chief of staff for operations, said July 22 during The AUSA Noon Report, a webinar series hosted by the Association of the U.S. Army.

A new report looking at the long-range military implications of the COVID-19 pandemic finds the Army well prepared because of changes in operational doctrine and training.

An analysis by the nonpartisan Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments says the Army’s evolving Multi-Domain Operations concept is a way to maintain a form of social distancing through its emphasis on “dis-aggregated, distributed units with varying degrees of connectivity conducting operations across the battlespace.”

The U.S. military is monitoring potential threats as the coronavirus pandemic continues to shutter communities and disrupt lives around the world.

“What we see are countries are turning inward right now,” Defense Secretary Mark Esper said during a virtual town hall March 24. “They’re looking very closely at their own internal affairs, how they treat and deal with the coronavirus, its spread.”

The Army remains at “marginal” strength despite continued improvements in readiness because it is struggling to modernize the force and rebuild troop strength, according to the conservative Heritage Foundation’s 2020 Index of U.S. Strength.

The 46-year-old public policy research and educational institution also determined the level of threats to vital U.S. interests is “high,” largely because of aggressive activities by China, Iran, North Korea, Russia and terrorist groups in the Middle East, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Milley credits leadership focus, logistics improvements and modestly increasing the size of the force for gains in combat readiness, but he also says it isn’t time to relax.

“Readiness has certainly improved, but I caution everybody we are not there yet,” Milley said in an interview published in the April­­–June issue of Army Sustainment, a quarterly publication from Army Logistics University.

The National Guard needs help from Congress so ongoing border deployments don’t leave it short of money for training, a top Guard official told lawmakers.

“We’re using training dollars to do this,” Air Force Gen. Joseph Lengyel, chief of the National Guard Bureau, told the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on defense. He said the Guard faces a $190 million shortfall.

Lengyel said the projected deployment cost is about $247 million, and the Guard is likely to meet it. If the money isn’t found by the end of the year, it could impact troops’ normal training schedules, he said.